Also spoken about at Paris was afforestation - growing forests in novel areas. A little more complicated by nature, this has not received quite the same glowing response as REDD+.
Forests sequester carbon from the air, leading to a negative radiative forcing (having a negative effect on surface energy balance, resulting in a lower temperature). But forests also lead to a set of complex, nonlinear biogeophysical feedbacks. These may act to enhance the negative radiative forcing, or offset it.
Perhaps the most important influence on the net radiative forcing is the location of the forest, and numerous studies warn that afforestation won't act to mitigate climate change everywhere on the planet.
![]() |
Figure 1. Dark boreal forests have significantly lower albedo than surrounding snow. Source: State of Alaska Fish and Game Dept. |
The Great Green Wall
The world’s largest tree planting project is already underway in China, and has seen over 66 billion trees planted since 1978. The Three-North Shelterbelt Project, dubbed the Great Green Wall, will stretch 4,500km by its completion in 2050, increasing global forest cover by over a tenth.
When completed, the wall will act as a protective shield from dust storms, which are becoming increasingly frequent and extreme as a result of growing desertification.
The logistics of the project are huge: people living in regions being afforested must undertake a certain number of mandatory tree-planting days per year. In rural areas this often means asking people to leave farmland untended and plant trees instead. But the trees are being planted in dry, arid regions, and many are not surviving. The project is also raising concerns among rural communities of potential groundwater depletion as a result of the new green wall.
GCM studies have also shown that the surface temperature will be raised as a result of the project, and precipitation in China will increase over most locations (Fan et. al., 1998; Gao et. al., 2003). The project has received heavy criticism, and must serve as a lesson to other countries considering afforestation programmes: future afforestation programmes must carefully consider the environment of the intended forest, and be certain of the success of such a large project before embarking upon it. There must also be careful research to model regional and global effects on climate by newly planted forests.
When completed, the wall will act as a protective shield from dust storms, which are becoming increasingly frequent and extreme as a result of growing desertification.
![]() |
Figure 3. Thin green line: the trees will form a barrier across dusty desert regions. Source: Imagine China via The Economist |
The logistics of the project are huge: people living in regions being afforested must undertake a certain number of mandatory tree-planting days per year. In rural areas this often means asking people to leave farmland untended and plant trees instead. But the trees are being planted in dry, arid regions, and many are not surviving. The project is also raising concerns among rural communities of potential groundwater depletion as a result of the new green wall.
GCM studies have also shown that the surface temperature will be raised as a result of the project, and precipitation in China will increase over most locations (Fan et. al., 1998; Gao et. al., 2003). The project has received heavy criticism, and must serve as a lesson to other countries considering afforestation programmes: future afforestation programmes must carefully consider the environment of the intended forest, and be certain of the success of such a large project before embarking upon it. There must also be careful research to model regional and global effects on climate by newly planted forests.
Nice post, I'm glad you discussed the extent of the failures in China's GGW. Did you know there's a similar project being developed in Africa, to establish a band of vegetation across the Sahel. Funnily enough it's also called the Great Green Wall!
ReplyDeleteWith regard to afforestation for climate mitigation, there is a very interesting editorial article 'Biological carbon sequestration must and can be a win-win approach' which contains a little comparison of the various forms of green sequestration. Might be worth a read: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-009-9695-y?
Thanks Chad. I hadn't heard about the African GGW actually - will have to check it out! Do you know if it's had any success so far?
DeleteThanks for the paper link too - I will check it out! :)
I think it's still yet to get off the ground, for the most part. I imagine the organisation of a transnational forestry project would take some time, though I believe World Bank funding has already been agreed upon.
DeleteThe pilot projects seem to be doing okay from the looks of it ( http://www.fao.org/resources/photos/building-the-african-wall-piece-by-piece/en/ ).
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete